Wednesday, September 10, 2014
A rejoinder filed this July by the state of El Salvador with the International Center for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), where the case will be heard, outlines three prerequisites that Pacific Rim Mining failed to meet.
- Pacific Rim did not hold land titles or landowners’ permission to mine in most of the area for which it had requested a concession;
- Pacific Rim’s Environmental Impact Study for the project was never approved; and
- Pacific Rim did not submit the required feasibility study.
The same document describes how company directors preferred to lobby for changes to El Salvador’s mining law – including appealing to the Pope – rather than live up to national norms.
For the last decade, mining-affected communities and broad segments of Salvadoran civil society, including the highest echelons of the Catholic Church, have categorically opposed industrial mining in El Salvador due to concerns that it would contaminate the country’s most important water source, the Lempa watershed. In 2008, the Salvadoran government introduced a de facto moratorium on large-scale mining that two successive administrations have maintained.
Protests and petitions calling on the company to drop its suit take place today in Toronto and will continue in Canada, the US and Australia throughout the month of September. A list of planned actions is available online here.
Useful background documents:
- A two page summary of El Salvador’s 200+ page rejoinder
- El Salvadoran civil society brief filed with the ICSID tribunal in July
- Publication ‘Debunking Eight Falsehoods by Pacific Rim Mining/OceanaGold in El Salvador’
For contacts and more information:
- Jen Moore, Latin America Program Coordinator, jen(at)miningwatch.ca, (613) 569-3439